Message 00243 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00223 Message: 9/9 L1 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] peer review



Hi all!

Sorry to be late.

2 weeks (14 days) ago graham wrote:
Questioning traditional peer review:

http://cameronneylon.net/blog/peer-review-what-is-it-good-for/

A nice article indeed. Effectively it more or less calls for complete
openness - which I share.

The problem, however, is, that it doesn't address the reader's
perspective. For the reader's perspective I think some classification
scheme is necessary to help readers to use their time as good as
possible.


						Grüße

						Stefan


Thread: joxT00223 Message: 9/9 L1 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00243 [Homepage] [Navigation]