Re: Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]

• From: graham <graham theseamans.net>
• Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:52:18 +0100

On 08/29/10 21:35, Mathieu ONeil wrote:

As for your question: essentially we will publish anything, as 
long as the author accepts that the published paper 
is accompanied by 'signals' regarding relevance, quality etc: as 
said previously the cost of publication or rejection 
is intended to be borne by the author. 

Having trouble understanding this: how does 'cost of rejection' fit with
'we will publish anything'? And is the 'cost' here meant to mean
the reputational cost of having bad work published with negative reviews
rather than just being rejected, or is there some other kind of cost
intended?

I'm not trying to reopen old debates, just having trouble finding the
conclusions looking through the list archives.

Thanks

Graham
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• References:
  • [jox] elsevier
    • From: Graham Seaman
  • Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• Next in thread: Re: Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]
• Previous in thread: Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]
• First in thread: [jox] elsevier
• Last in thread: Re: Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]
• Previous thread: [jox] New layout options
• Next thread: [jox] open peer review
• Next by Date: Re: Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]
• Prev by Date: Action September [was: Re: [jox] elsevier]