[jox] Re: Inclusion in SC

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:59:34 +0200

Hi Mathieu!

Last week (9 days ago) Mathieu ONeil wrote:

So, do we want to have the editor inviting people pretty much as before, based on personal assessment that the person would be a worthwhile addition as a reviewer and participant?

Well, I feel that the direction the journal takes is constantly at
stake. Adding people who nobody knows but you feels to me like a
rather subtle way to influence this direction. To be very friendly: In
fact that is something I'm really unhappy with for quite some time
now.

My suggestion would be that nobody is added to this list anonymously.
IMHO everyone added needs to introduce herself/himself. May be we
could have a couple of questions for everyone to answer.


						Grüße

						Stefan

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jox] Re: Inclusion in SC
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• References:
  • Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011
    • From: Jakob Rigi
  • Inclusion in SC [was: Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011]
    • From: Mathieu ONeil

• Next in thread: Re: [jox] Re: Inclusion in SC
• Previous in thread: Inclusion in SC [was: Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011]
• First in thread: Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011
• Last in thread: [jox] Re: On-topic and off-topic
• Previous thread: [jox] Extended deadline: CfP on ?Expanding the frontiers of hacking?
• Next thread: [jox] Scientific committee
• Next by Date: On-topic and off-topic (was: Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011)
• Prev by Date: Re: [jox] Critical Studies in Peer production or Critical Studies in Commons Production?