Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties

• From: Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller <sloyment gmx.net>
• Date: Sun, 7 Sep 2003 20:14:14 +0200

Martin,

On Sonntag 07 September 2003 18:03, auskadi wrote:

Thanks for the info but (as a lawyer) I simply don't agree
with this sort of legal anaylsis.

I am not a lawyer, just a reader of the Debian Legal list. If you 
believe that Mozilla is not free, please discuss it there, too.

cu,
Thomas }:o{#
-- - http://www.bildungsbande.de/~sloyment/ - --
"Look! They have different music on the dance floor..."
_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
    • From: auskadi

• References:
  • [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
    • From: auskadi
  • Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
    • From: Thomas Uwe Gruettmueller
  • Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
    • From: auskadi

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
• First in thread: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: Cross Posting
• Previous thread: [ox-en] /. article: Distribution of Wealth in a Robot-Driven World
• Next thread: [ox-en] Plans for a Linux Institute (Frederick Noronha)
• Next by Date: [ox-en] Technical note: Lists now conform to RFCs 2369 and 2919
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties