Message 01475 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT01324 Message: 30/104 L12 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
yOn 17 Oct 2003, Rich Walker wrote:
This implies that the '4 freedoms' of the FSF need to be expanded to '5 freedoms', subsuming the old 'academic freedom' :-)A favour: put your (suggested) text of the "5 freedoms" up on a page somewhere, so we can google for it, and later find it in the WayBack Machine. in other words - create the manifesto, even if you immediately wash your hands of it cheers, Rich. easy-peasy (since this mail will become a web-page)
Generalizing the 'four freedoms' of the FSF (http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html) to any kind of research - and development, if relevant - not just software: Five Freedoms * The freedom to study any problem (freedom -1) * The freedom to use the results of this study for any purpose (freedom 0) * The freedom to examine the raw materials and methods used in this study, and use them for your own needs (freedom 1). * The freedom to redistribute copies so you can help your neighbor (freedom 2). * The freedom to improve the results, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits (freedom 3). Freedom -1 is the old idea of 'academic freedom'; it is the prerequisite for all the other freedoms Freedom 0 is necessary but dangerous. It may be restricted by law (in the same way that 'innocent till proved guilty' is a good principle, so is freedom 0). Implementing the remaining freedoms requires you to document your sources and to use a free license (if the material is covered by copyright) and to abstain from the use of patents. Graham _______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT01324 Message: 30/104 L12 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 01475 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |