Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.

• From: Graham Seaman <graham seul.org>
• Date: Tue, 4 Nov 2003 17:38:10 -0500 (EST)

On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Russell McOrmond wrote:

  There is also major cause for concern from the other side as well.  It
is my understanding that IBM includes a number of software patents that
SCO is infringing in their counter-suit.  Has anyone done the analysis yet
to determine whether these are methods within the Linux kernel itself?  I
know of no patents license statement from IBM that would make SCO
infringing but the rest of us not infringing.

Did anyone find an answer to this question? Is there any analysis around 
anywhere yet?

Graham

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/

• References:
  • Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
    • From: Russell McOrmond

• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
• First in thread: [ox-en] Impaired - is it SCO? preliminary thoughts.
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Berlin Declaration on Open Access
• Next thread: [ox-en] participatory research (was: the role of science and universities)
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell
• Prev by Date: [ox-en] RedHat and Fedora and SuSE and Novell