Re: [ox-en] Re: Role of markets
- From: "Michel Bauwens" <michelsub2004 gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:19:50 +0700
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
comments inline
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Paul Cockshott <wpc dcs.gla.ac.uk> wrote:
Michel Bauwens wrote:
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
I dont have a triarchy of forms of ownership, I just gave 3 examples and
said that these were the stable forms for industrial production. More
generally I would put forward a 16 fold division of property rights.
Who owns what is the basic question which must be answered by any system of
prop-
erty law.
- how would you characterize trusts?
What kind of trust?
For example: http://p2pfoundation.net/Trusts: " *stakeholder trusts can
achieve things that neither government nor markets can: responsible and
equitable long-term management of a shared resource*"
After the invention of industrial technologies which need the co-operation
of a large group of people using expensive equipment to produce things,
there are only three possible forms of property relations that can
reproduce
themselves:
1. Private capitalist industry
2. Publicly owned industry
3. Producer Co-operatives
rereading your original 'there are only 3 forms that can reproduce
themselves', I think this is not correct, there must be others in your 16
...
here's how peer production, through its licensing regime, reproduces itself:
http://p2pfoundation.net/Circulation_of_the_Common
[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de