RE: [ox-en] Robinsonades (was: Re: Role of markets)
- From: "Paul Cockshott" <wpc dcs.gla.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 23:04:55 +0100
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Eldreds proposals on this struck me as pretty reactionary when I first read them.
Far worse than having carbon rationing,
carbon rationing at least allows you to be sure that the total emissions are correct
price manipulation to ensure this by rental charges is very difficult.
In addition carbon rationing is redistributive in income terms, whereas his
rent proposals are not.
Paul Cockshott
Dept of Computing Science
University of Glasgow
[PHONE NUMBER REMOVED]
www.dcs.gla.ac.uk/~wpc/reports/
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-list-en oekonux.org on behalf of Franz Nahrada
Sent: Tue 8/19/2008 10:59 PM
To: list-en oekonux.org
Subject: Re: [ox-en] Robinsonades (was: Re: Role of markets)
list-en oekonux.org writes:
[1
The points made below are effectively refuted by Zachariah,
particularly the point about equalisation of profit rates.
a more comprehensive summary of the theory pointing at the extensive
theoretical implications of forms of extra-profit with its relation to
rents and monopolies is here (also an older piece)
http://marx101.blogspot.com/2008/03/forms-of-appearance-of-surplus-value.html
(Mike Roth and Michael Eldred)
Eldred who has finally and in my view "unjustly" abandoned the value
theory of labour nevertheless analyzes the further interplay of these
forms here: (I do not endorse his ideas about production factors or carbon
sink industry)
http://192.220.96.165/untpltcl/qstnerth.html
Franz
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de
[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de