Re: [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad

• From: Christian Siefkes <christian siefkes.net>
• Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 14:05:31 +0100

Stefan Meretz wrote:

This seems to be a useful, very detailed discussion of the LTV: 
dreamscape.com.

The link got lost, here it is:
http://www.dreamscape.com/rvien/Economics/Essays/LTV-FAQ.html

Best regards
	Christian

-- 
|-------- Dr. Christian Siefkes --------- christian siefkes.net ---------
|   Homepage: http://www.siefkes.net/   |   Blog: http://www.keimform.de/
|   Better Bayesian Analysis:           |   Peer Production Everywhere:
|   http://bart-project.com/            |   http://peerconomy.org/wiki/
|------------------------------------------ OpenPGP Key ID: 0x346452D8 --
Those in authority tent to be annoyed by hackers' general attitude of
disobedience. But that disobedience is a byproduct of the qualities that
make them good programmers. They may laugh at the CEO when he talks in
generic corporate newspeech, but they also laugh at someone who tells them
a certain problem can't be solved. Suppress one, and you suppress the
other.
        -- Paul Graham, Hackers and Painters

• References:
  • [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad
    • From: Stefan Meretz

• Next in thread: [ox-en] Re: [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad
• Previous in thread: [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad
• First in thread: [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad
• Last in thread: [ox-en] Re: [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Conference schedule V1.0
• Next thread: [ox-en] Discussing the open hardware bank
• Next by Date: [ox-en] Re: [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad
• Prev by Date: [ox-en] Marx’ Theory of Value and Why Exchange Can Be “Equal” and Still Bad