Message 05841 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT05825 Message: 5/12 L4 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain]
I always prefer consensus to a democratic vote. But there are controversies where it is hard to find a consensus (even within one individual...) In such situations, the force to find a consensus can be counter-productive, since very subtle mechanisms (not transparent to the individuals) can determine the consensus that is actually found.
that' s right, for consensus you need only one option, or a way to eliminate other options without fight, that is, with a non-visible force so consensus systems need weel stablished hierachy systems anarchy usualy leeds to a natural hierarchy system -- Diego Saravia Diego.Saravia gmail.com NO FUNCIONA->dsa unsa.edu.ar [2 text/html] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT05825 Message: 5/12 L4 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 05841 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |