[jox] Signals _and_ Accept/Reject
- From: Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>
- Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 07:41:32 +1100
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Hi George, all
The hermit awakes! Will sparks fly as they did a year ago? ;-)
@ Brian Whitworth: Brian, what do you think about the below idea: allowing people to choose between signals (used to be 'ratings') and plain accepted/rejected articles? Would this introduces a dissonance in the system and an unwanted division in the articles? Or would it be OK, in your view?
Thanks for advising,
cheers
Mathieu
2. Regarding the *submission process*: although this might complicate
things a bit in the beginning (for both editorial team and potential
contributing authors), i agree with the idea of letting submitting
authors decide whether they prefer their submissions to be evaluated
according to the accept/reject model or based on 'signals'.
X,
g.
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal
****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal