Re: [jox] Suggested Site Structure
- From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2010 09:03:28 +0200
Hi Mathieu and all!
Last week (9 days ago) Mathieu ONeil wrote:
OK, well here is a shot at a site structure. I tried to keep it logical and simple. Thanks for comments.
My cents.
I'm focusing on the content area of the pages - i.e. the big middle
column in the layout. The contents in the left and right columns - the
portlets I mentioned in an earlier mail - need to be discussed
separately.
=-=-=
[front page]
critical studies in peer production
call research opinion reports journal
I understand that this list should be the navigation bar at the top -
right?
Any content for the front page? I'd suggest the mission statement
until we have something suitable for this.
=-=-=
[call page: all info on one page]
critical studies in peer production: call for submissions
=mission statement
==[text as in current cfp]
As noted above I'd put the mission statement to the front page.
=submission guidelines
==[text as in current cfp]
For more information on our open peer review process, go <here[peer review]>
Ok.
=-=-=
[research page: list leads to papers or streams sub-pages]
critical studies in peer production: research
These long papers focus on key facets of peer production, and report substantial findings. They have been peer reviewed.
So this would be the core of the journal - right?
=wikipedia stream
==[wp001] <title>
==[wp002] <title>
=political theory stream
==[pt001] <Merten & Meretz, Germ Form Theory> [under review]
==[pt001] <title>
=governance stream
etc
That would mean that you are introducing a topic based folder system
at this level. Can be done but technically it could be done by the
category system I mentioned a while ago.
As topics I'd use the list we have defined in the mission statement:
the political economy of peer production; peer production and
expertise; critical theory and peer production; peer production and
exchange; peer production and social movements; peer production as
an alternative to capitalism; peer production and capitalist
cooptation; governance in peer projects; peer production and ethics;
the peer production of hardware; peer production and feminism; peer
production, industry and ecology.
Probably without the "peer production" phrase.
=-=-=
[opinion page: list leads to subpages for papers]
critical studies in peer production: opinion
These shorter papers aim to stimulate debate by confronting ideas and perspectives.
Does an opinion section really make sense for CSPP? I thought we are
doing something close to a research journal and mere opinions IMHO are
not suited well for this. Also there are a couple of options where
such opinions can be posted - preferably on the `Oekonux list`_ of
course - and make far more sense.
.. _Oekonux list http://www.oekonux.org/list-en/
=-=-=
[reports page: lists lead to subgroup or submission subpages]
critical studies in peer production: reports
These pages offer accounts of peer production events and conferences, interviews with participants and reviews.
=conferences
==[cf001] Niesyto, Critical Point Of View - Bangalore/Amsterdam.
==[cf002] Fuster Morell, Free Culture Forum - Barcelona [I think this is right - Mayo?]
==[cf003] Karatzogianni, VIRT3C - Hull.
etc
Ok. But what we definitely need also is an events section where
upcoming events are posted. I tried this out for the Oekonux site and
it is really a great feature.
=books/projects/video
==[bp001] <title>
etc
These would be reviews of such material - right?
=free spaces
==[fs001] <title>
etc
What is this for?
=-=-=
[journal page: list leads to subpages]
critical studies in peer production: journal
These pages describe the process through which the journal is produced.
=peer review
== research
== other
=people
== editor
== governance board
== scientific committee
=email list
==subscription
==archive
[end]
That would be the more organizational section then. Ok.
Grüße
Stefan