Re: [jox] Research paper: template for PDF versions
- From: nathaniel tkacz <nathanieltkacz gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 17:24:42 +1000
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
i think it would be good to have a html version as well as pdf. that way
people can link to articles as part of the cspp site, rather than as a stand
alone pdf article (because the html page will have links back to the
homepage etc). i think people are more likely to look at the rest of the
content that way. does that make sense? :)
Nate Tkacz
School of Culture and Communication
University of Melbourne
Twitter: http://twitter.com/__nate__
Research Page: http://nathanieltkacz.net
Current project: http://networkcultures.org/wpmu/cpov/about-2/
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:28 AM, Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>wrote:
[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Hi all
The question arises as to whether we should have research papers which can
be very long - Andersson on filesharing clocks in at 11,000 words - in html
and PDF formats or only as PDFs?
Also there is the question of the template for the PDF. At this stage I
don't really feel like experimenting too much so if someone has a clean and
simple doc template for journal articles I would really appreciate any
suggestions.
( Alessandro: the format for JCom seems OK to me, would it be possible to
get hold of a template or the specs? Many thanks.)
cheers,
Mathieu
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal
[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal