Re: [jox] Licence for articles

• From: Stefan Meretz <stefan meretz.de>
• Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2011 14:22:58 +0200

On 2011-06-02 16:38, Felix Stalder wrote:

I agree. Classic copyleft is the best. I personally don't really like
CC that much as a brand, but it's the standards and there is nothing
to object against the substance of BY-NC-SA.

Classical copyleft is BY-SA and _not_ BY-NC-SA.

So, yes, classical copyleft is the right choice: BY-SA.

My reason: Copyleft is more inclusive than NC, and I really appreciate 
to see Rupert Murdoch printing our texts under BY-SA. Remember: the 
license have to be maintained. Thus, I would like to see the freedom 
virus everywhere.

Ciao,
Stefan

-- 
Start here: www.meretz.de
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

• References:
  • [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Alessandro Delfanti
  • Re: [jox] Licence for articles
    • From: Felix Stalder

• Previous in thread: Re: [jox] Licence for articles
• First in thread: [jox] Licence for articles
• Previous thread: [jox] Special issue for CSPP: DRAFT!!!
• Next thread: [jox] Identity of reviewers
• Next by Date: Re: [jox] Special issue for CSPP: DRAFT!!!
• Prev by Date: Re: SV: [jox] Licence for articles