Re: [jox] Scientific committee

• From: Mathieu ONeil <mathieu.oneil anu.edu.au>
• Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2011 15:03:42 +0200

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]

[snip]

Nope, commons is _not_ opposed to private property:
http://www.keimform.de/2010/commons-in-a-taxonomy-of-goods/

Hi Stefan

I had a look at your text but was not illuminated, could you please provide a more precise reference - thanks.

Mathieu


[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [jox] Scientific committee
    • From: jmp
  • [jox] Notion of the commons
    • From: Stefan Meretz

• References:
  • [jox] Scientific committee
    • From: nathaniel tkacz
  • RE: [jox] Scientific committee
    • From: Matthew Allen
  • RE: [jox] Scientific committee
    • From: Mathieu ONeil
  • Re: [jox] Scientific committee
    • From: Stefan Meretz

• Next in thread: [jox] Notion of the commons
• Previous in thread: Re: [jox] Scientific committee
• First in thread: [jox] Scientific committee
• Last in thread: Re: [jox] Message from Jean Zin on peer production
• Previous thread: Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011
• Next thread: [jox] Purpose of the journal
• Next by Date: Re: [jox] Critical Studies in Peer production or Critical Studies in Commons Production?
• Prev by Date: Re: [jox] Journal report - 19 August 2011