Message 00270 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT00232 Message: 6/6 L2 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Hi Benja and all! One additional small point. 3 weeks (25 days) ago B Fallenstein wrote:
Thirdly, it is *not* self-unfolding to sit in the classroom and do the things a teacher tells you to do. Granted, if you allow students to follow their self-unfolding, some students may learn reading at a later time, and a very, very small number may actually not learn to read at all. So what? It is students' self-unfolding that is good for them *and* for society at large, and alienation can only work against that. If a student takes longer to desire reading, who would gain anything if they were forced to learn it earlier? If a student does not learn to read at all, and their talents are in other fields (woodwork, say), what would be lost if they explored these instead?
I'd like to emphasize that in a world full of written text it's simply useful to be able to read. I remember when I was a child, that at some point I was keen to learn reading a clock - because then I know when my favorite TV programs are running ;-) . This extended my freedom - just as it extends my freedom when I learn useful things about say GNU/Linux. Mit Freien Grüßen Stefan _______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT00232 Message: 6/6 L2 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 00270 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |