| Message 01769 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thread: oxenT01324 Message: 50/104 L10 | [In index] | ||
| [First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
| [Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Hi Rich and all! Last month (56 days ago) Rich Walker wrote:
The problem with lots of visions of another world, like socialisms and Oekonux, is that most of them concern themselves with the end-state only, as in, 'this is where we want to end up', while leaving the largest question of them all, 'how do we get there', alone or (in the case of many revolutionary socialists) up to the deus ex machina of some total revolutionary event that just changes everything.
The end is easier to grasp sometimes than the way to it. That's part of the problem. However, from the end you can at least guess what does *not* serve as a means to this end. For instance any relying on the exchange system.
Absolutely. This is why I suggest that we should dismiss all routes to change that do not go through a legitimate political party with a definite route to social transformation through electing political animals in suits to political roles. Indeed, in Britain, the Terrorism Act actually defines terrorism as seeking political goals outside political parties - and we must not support terrorism...
Are you really serious on that or is that a joke? I mean if one thing is inevitably rooted in the capitalist systems then it is political parties. Mit Freien Grüßen Stefan _______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
| Thread: oxenT01324 Message: 50/104 L10 | [In index] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Message 01769 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |