Message 01800 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT01375 Message: 3/3 L2 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox-en] garage gene synthesis



On Sat, 13 Dec 2003, Stefan Merten wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hi Graham and list!

2 months (65 days) ago Graham Seaman wrote:
Slashdot has a discussion on a paper:

http://www.molsci.org/~rcarlson/Carlson_Pace_and_Prolif.pdf

Didn't read it yet but...

predicting the ability of people in the near future to do genetic 
manipulation on affordable equipment at home (crrent price for a DNA 
synthesizer 10,000 dollars and dropping..)

...a similar thing came up before.

Entirely in line with oekonux discussion on fabbers etc but bringing
up a whole load of new and scary questions... looks like a very 
interesting paper (which makes explicit comparisons with free software)

Actually I'm not very astonished about such ideas. I mean genetic
manipulation is to some high degree an information thing and thus a
natural subject to similar processes as we see in Free Software.

Can you explain what you think are the new and scary questions?


If a new physical virus is as easy to make as a new computer virus,
people will make them. If it is as easy to make as a new computer 
virus, then the only way to stop them being made will be to stop the 
knowledge of how to make them being shared. But we already know that the
only way that it is possible to prevent knowledge being shared is by 
total dictatorship over all aspects of life.

The scary part is thinking 'yes, I would like people to be stopped
from making new diseases'. And looking at the consequences.


Of course what immediately comes to (a leftist) mind is that genetic
engineering is bad. Full stop.

Why?

However, why can't genetic engineering be seen as just another
technology with a very high potential. Such high potential is always
both dangerous and empowering. However, as far as I can see the
negative and dangerous things today mainly come from the embedding in
capitalism. I mean manipulation of corn for instance is more or less
to maximize the profits of some seed companies. On the other hand
there are these genetically modified bacteria producing insulin - is
that bad?

No, unless it has side effects you don't mention.

Graham
 

						Mit Freien Grüßen

						Stefan

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3in
Charset: noconv
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7, an Emacs/PGP interface

iQCVAwUBP9papAnTZgC3zSk5AQFAmwP/TNGRn/pTADv6gzAIRVshCRF+6qF7UEuD
tzZOTcn/DuESF8v4ENvh2awdyFtE6/pkn+WBNvV6UkSB0Fbry/YHEWA/lX0xPvvm
8Wl8KjRt1XQrg+BfoUMM0b2UCQ1rJNP7EVGDyynDL4c+Iv9jlWMIygTcSGx7+TIt
aVv8DtXcdoM=
=pOWQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/


_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/



Thread: oxenT01375 Message: 3/3 L2 [In index]
Message 01800 [Homepage] [Navigation]