Message 02019 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT01690 Message: 56/89 L6 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Niall Douglas wrote:
Very, very few investors will agree to the GPL. It permanently locks you out of flexibility which you might suddenly need later on when an opportunity arises. Of course if you prevent anyone else altering your GPL code this isn't a problem. However, why then not use the LGPL which can be converted to the GPL by clause 3 yet keeps all your options open?
<big grin> I managed to persuade a major UK innovation seed fund that our work *had* to be GPL'd. It took a little bit of work to get the ideas across to their legal people, but in the end they understood that the kind of innovation we were proposing could not be done in any other context. Of course, their funding wasn't "hire a stable full of programmers and a couple of thousand gallons of marketing people" funding. </big grin> cheers, Rich. -- rich walker | technical person | Shadow Robot Company | rw shadow.org.uk front-of-tshirt space to let 251 Liverpool Road | London N1 1LX | +UK 20 7700 2487 _______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT01690 Message: 56/89 L6 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 02019 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |