Message 03894 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT03886 Message: 7/22 L3 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
I must agree with the gratis part. Saying that free software is free but not gratis is an ideological statement, not a factual one. Stating that it is free is a factual and analytical one. Pricing is a mechanism for allocating scarce resources. Something that is reproducible at free or marginal cost, cannot be sold at a price unless on a voluntary basis, as you can always obtain a free copy. Are there any concrete cases of business models regarding free software that are solely based on selling the software. My understanding is that successfull OS companies are selling service packages (installing, servicing, training, etc...) If a company is paying for software alone, it is my understanding that they are paying for some kind of 'guarantee' which is why some companies 'insist' on paying. The money goes to that guarantee, not to the software which they could obtain from somewhere else. In the hypothetical case that they would sell the software, but that you cannot obtain it in any other, it would logically follow that it is not free software, as the code would not be available. If the code is available, it would mean that there is always a gratis alternative. I think that given the constraints, you have done a good job with the presentation. Michel
* The actual product is gratis However: Price plays a role, but is not crucialGiven how confused most people still are aboutthisfree-as-in-speech-vs.-free-as-in-beer ambiguity, Ifind the above pointnot very helpful. What is "the product",As long as we talk about Free Software there is a very easy answer: the Free Software. I.e. the deliverables which are installed on my, your, Yuwei's, ... computer. No doubt. And Free Software is certainly a product because it is not given to us by nature - instead it is produced by someone. Again no doubt. Really: I can not see what your question is here.and what is gratis about it ?It is gratis when I can obtain it without paying money. Meanwhile this is even literally true because I got a DSL flat rate so internet connection meanwhile is part of the general preconditions of life. Indeed for the Kubuntu I installed lately I paid exactly nothing. Stop! I payed for one CD-R as a boot CD. But that's it. For me this is gratis. No doubt.It may have been best to skip this point, orsimply stating that the issueis in fact about freedom, not price.
The P2P Foundation researches, documents and promotes peer to peer alternatives. Wiki and Encyclopedia, at http://p2pfoundation.net; Blog, at http://blog.p2pfoundation.net; Newsletter, at http://integralvisioning.org/index.php?topic=p2p Basic essay at http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499; interview at http://poynder.blogspot.com/2006/09/p2p-very-core-of-world-to-come.html; video interview, at http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/09/29/network_collaboration_peer_to_peer.htm ____________________________________________________________________________________ Don't let your dream ride pass you by. Make it a reality with Yahoo! Autos. http://autos.yahoo.com/index.html _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT03886 Message: 7/22 L3 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 03894 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |