Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions

• From: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
• Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:25:50 +0100

Hi Michel and all!

3 weeks (21 days) ago Michael Bauwens wrote:

He distinguishes four factors, divided over two axes.

[...]

Transition III: capital starts transcending national
boundaries but in a way that can no longer be contained by nation-states;
diffusion completes but at the same times also fails to go very deep, causing
deep cultural strains in the developing world; lack of global state power
renders inoperable any solution to deep social divisions




Phase   4: external
accumulation with a global passive state

This sounds to me a bit like wishful thinking - probably because he
has one quarter left in his square which he needs to fill.

Does he give any reasons why such a transition is necessary. And I
mean from the perspective of capital - not some moral perspective
which largely plays no role.


						Gr?ü?ße

						Stefan

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• References:
  • Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
    • From: Michael Bauwens

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• First in thread: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Motivation in Peer Production
• Next thread: Re: Inefficiency in capitalism (was: Re: [ox-en] Re: Governments using Free Software)
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] Re: Importance of price