Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions

• From: Stefan Meretz <stefan.meretz hbv.org>
• Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2008 16:18:18 +0100

Argh, big mistake!

On 2007-12-04 22:26, Stefan Meretz wrote:

Thus, we have to develop a new way of
production using most developed productive forces, and then ownership
will follow. "Will follow" does not mean automatically, there will be
fights. But it would be the right sequence: First the production,
then the societal form.

The sentence in the middle has to be:

   "Will follow" does not mean automatically, there will be _no_ fights.

I am sorry.

Thanks to Raoul, who indirectly points me to my mistake (his mail from 
23th dec, 11:52 -- my answer follows). 

Ciao,
Stefan

-- 
Start here: www.meretz.de
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• References:
  • Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
    • From: Michael Bauwens
  • Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
    • From: Raoul
  • Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
    • From: Stefan Meretz

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• Previous in thread: Denial Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• First in thread: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] Labor contradictions
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Motivation in Peer Production
• Next thread: Re: Inefficiency in capitalism (was: Re: [ox-en] Re: Governments using Free Software)
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] Motto for the 4th conference
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] Motto for the 4th conference