Message 04470 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT04409 Message: 12/19 L6 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox-en] DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT - CfC for the conference - DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT



Hi,

Michel Bauwens wrote:
what do other thinks about including, or not, the sharing platforms?

I think that sharing platforms (such as YouTube) should be included, but
that social networking sites (such as Facebook) shouldn't, for the reasons
given by StefanMn.

Hence I would propose to keep the current formulation:

"Sharing platforms like Flickr and YouTube"

Or maybe to make the proprietary nature of these platforms clearer:

"Sharing on proprietary platforms such as Flickr and YouTube; sharing on
open platforms such as doomicile"

(Anyone knows other/better examples for open sharing platforms?)

Just me 2ct...
	Christian

-- 
|-------- Dr. Christian Siefkes --------- christian siefkes.net ---------
| Homepage: http://www.siefkes.net/    |    Blog: http://www.keimform.de/
| Peer Production in the Physical World:       http://www.peerconomy.org/
|------------------------------------------ OpenPGP Key ID: 0x346452D8 --
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. All progress, therefore,
depends upon the unreasonable man.
        -- George Bernard Shaw



Thread: oxenT04409 Message: 12/19 L6 [In index]
Message 04470 [Homepage] [Navigation]