Re: [ox-en] DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT - CfC for the conference - DRAFT DRAFT DRAFT
- From: Christian Siefkes <christian siefkes.net>
- Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:53:02 +0100
Hi,
Michel Bauwens wrote:
what do other thinks about including, or not, the sharing platforms?
I think that sharing platforms (such as YouTube) should be included, but
that social networking sites (such as Facebook) shouldn't, for the reasons
given by StefanMn.
Hence I would propose to keep the current formulation:
"Sharing platforms like Flickr and YouTube"
Or maybe to make the proprietary nature of these platforms clearer:
"Sharing on proprietary platforms such as Flickr and YouTube; sharing on
open platforms such as doomicile"
(Anyone knows other/better examples for open sharing platforms?)
Just me 2ct...
Christian
--
|-------- Dr. Christian Siefkes --------- christian siefkes.net ---------
| Homepage: http://www.siefkes.net/ | Blog: http://www.keimform.de/
| Peer Production in the Physical World: http://www.peerconomy.org/
|------------------------------------------ OpenPGP Key ID: 0x346452D8 --
The reasonable man adapts himself to the world. The unreasonable man
persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. All progress, therefore,
depends upon the unreasonable man.
-- George Bernard Shaw