Message 05021 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT05017 Message: 4/5 L3 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
In list-en oekonux.org "Vasilis Kostakis" <kostakis.b gmail.com> writes:
The institutionalization of the Commons is not an imperative just for the wealth distribution ,as you articulate it, but amongst others wealth distribution, in the proposed way, is a process that could simultaneously eliminate pollution and provide a basic income.
Vasilis, thank you for your swift reply. As you can see I am also struggling with the idea of basic income. Compare it to the "safe jobs" of the past, where the broad consensus with the accumulation regime was bought on the base of dependencies. There is a chance that in the aftermath of the economical crisis a call for a "new deal" policy will be succesful and could be organized around a commons. Nevertheless, it seems that solving the economical and solving the ecological crisis are mostly seen as two independent things. Only if we can show the economic power of the commons we might be able to achieve something. My friend Joseph Smyth had some thoughts on this that might be relevant: http://www.dorfwiki.org/wiki.cgi?FranzNahrada/FromSuburbiaToGlobalVillages/EconomicPowerOfSustainableDevelopment Franz _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT05017 Message: 4/5 L3 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 05021 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |