Re: [ox-en] Re: free vs. common (was: Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based socie

• From: Diego Saravia <diego.saravia gmail.com>
• Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:05:14 -0300

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_good


you can see the clasification of public/common/private and club, all them
economic or non-free goods

so, you have free or non-free (economic) gods

non-free could be public, common, private and club

* software does not come about by duplication
* its very often a community effort
* it needs protection from privatisation

thats good reasons to recognize its also a commons.

[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• References:
  • Re: free vs. common (was: Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based society?)
    • From: Diego Saravia
  • [ox-en] Re: free vs. common (was: Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based socie
    • From: Franz Nahrada

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based society?
• Previous in thread: [ox-en] Re: free vs. common (was: Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based socie
• First in thread: [ox-en] keimform.de: Reopening the Commons: Reversing the Enclosure
• Last in thread: [ox-en] Re: Commons - their historical role and possible futures
• Previous thread: [ox-en] OXCARS in Barcelona: first non-competitive awards in the history of Culture
• Next thread: [ox-en] open source and wikipolitics
• Next by Date: Re: free vs. common (was: Re: [ox-en] A name for a peer-production-based society?)
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] Gift economies - again