Re: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic

• From: august <august alien.mur.at>
• Date: Wed, 19 May 2004 16:33:51 +0200 (CEST)

Pretty much, yes. Because if you prohibit any of these, then you are
also (usually) prohibiting people from defending themselves against
these things. Also, hindering citizens is *much* easier than hindering
governments, who in most jurisdictions can simply say "matter of
national security" and override your license anyway.

this mis-match of power is partly my concern.

Vannevar Bush, and did he have anything to do with that? Are you
confusing him with Oppenheimer and Teller?

do a google search for "Vannevar Bush bomb"


-august.


_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: projekt oekonux.de

• References:
  • Re: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic
    • From: Rich Walker

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic
• First in thread: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Fwd: WOS3 newsletter 1 / 2004 - English
• Next thread: [ox-en] [Free-sklyarov-uk] EU Ambassadors vote to back Software Patents
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] non-commercial software lic