Re: [jox] New Draft CFP

• From: Raoul <raoulv club-internet.fr>
• Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:30:30 +0200

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Hi Mathieu and all,

But I think it would be useful to be more specific and integrate both ideas by writing: “commons- based **and** commons-oriented production”. That might seem redundant, but “based” may mean that only the input is “common”. “Commons-oriented” makes more explicit that the output is also “common”.

OK, well I see your point but stylistically it is a bit heavy to have both in my view. Whichever one encompasses the other could be put in - or alternatively a formulation like "commons-based and oriented"?

Raoul


[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

• References:
  • [jox] Draft CFP
    • From: Mathieu O'Neil
  • Re: [jox] Draft CFP
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • [jox] New Draft CFP
    • From: Mathieu O'Neil
  • Re: [jox] New Draft CFP
    • From: Raoul
  • Re: [jox] New Draft CFP
    • From: Mathieu O'Neil

• Next in thread: Re: [jox] New Draft CFP
• Previous in thread: Re: [jox] New Draft CFP
• First in thread: [jox] Title of the journal (was: Re: Welcome to the journal maintainer :-))
• Last in thread: Openness and its limits (was: Re: [jox] Mission statement)
• Next thread: Re: [jox] Request for comments
• Next by Date: RE: [jox] New Draft CFP
• Prev by Date: [jox] Fwd: VIRT3C Hull Call For Papers 26-28 March 2010