Message 00228 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00223 Message: 7/9 L2 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] peer review



I wasn't trying to take sides in any particular arguments, just pointing
to what I thought was an interesting and relevant discussion (though
maybe more oriented to physical than social sciences).

Graham

Athina Karatzogianni wrote:
[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
Call me a nutcase, but my personal stance is any paper well-researched and
reasonably referencend and argued is worth publishing whatever the
background and ideology of the author or the reviewer. Perhaps my belief
that most reviewers would be in that category is misplaced, but I d like to
believe that peer review ultimately works better than asking 200 people from
the street to vote on it .


On Mon, Feb 8, 2010 at 4:48 PM, graham <graham theseamans.net> wrote:

  
Questioning traditional peer review:

http://cameronneylon.net/blog/peer-review-what-is-it-good-for/

Graham
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal

    



  

______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal



Thread: joxT00223 Message: 7/9 L2 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00228 [Homepage] [Navigation]