Message 00889 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: joxT00881 Message: 6/89 L5 [In date index] [In thread index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [jox] A response to Michel and Jakob



[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
<There are two realities: the capitalist to get rid off, and the p2p to
get flourished. They have qualitatively different logics, but today
they necessarily always appear in mixed modes. Marxian theory made for
the old does not apply to the new. The new quality needs new notions
and theory. Thus I see and observe the danger of re-importing old
thinking.>

Agreed, on the condtion that you come up with the goods <g>. It is
certainly the same that motivates my imperfect attempts at p2p theory,
instead of using the old socialist/marxist framework exclusively, though of
course certain insights retain their 'value' ...

On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 6:33 PM, Stefan Meretz <stefan meretz.de> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 15.03.2012 11:51, schrieb Michel Bauwens:
so even as we work with a new conception of value as peer
producers contributing to our commons, we are embedded in a
capitalist logic where capital is extracting their kind of value
from our work, and as I argued in Al Jazeera, the feedback loop
between the two kinds of value is broken, hence both a crisis of
capital accumulation and a crisis of precarity

If not metaphorical speeking, but stricly in the Marxian: Capital is
not extracting "value", because value is not an essence which can be
extracted like sucking soda from a bottle. Capital is extracting our
energy and creativity to privatly produce a commodity, which it then
traded on markets has a value (be it a material product or offering an
advertisement platform like Facebook as you mentioned).

So I would always prefer to says: Capital is turning human energy and
creativity into value. But reading your usage of the term "value" more
metaphorically I am fine with your description.

so, by talking about the marxian theory of value, or any other one,
we are describing one aspect of these social processes .. but this
does not mean that "we" are re-importing the logic, it's the
'reality' we are facing

There are two realities: the capitalist to get rid off, and the p2p to
get flourished. They have qualitatively different logics, but today
they necessarily always appear in mixed modes. Marxian theory made for
the old does not apply to the new. The new quality needs new notions
and theory. Thus I see and observe the danger of re-importing old
thinking.

so the real problem remains, i.e. insuring the social reproduction
of the commoners, 'outside' or 'in parallel' with, the processes of
capital accumulation?

Yes! We do not get rid of real problems by only creating nice new
theories ;)

Ciao,
Stefan

- --
Start here: www.meretz.de
OpenPGP-ID: 0x1D4BB160
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPYdOTAAoJECQtw+IdS7FgjG4IALPLXEfWF1Rqx7L+S0done70
uR+Ex6DKY7nBbyEwp9e3xDeny54Zb3aJIp0YRTc1zl9ZF/dxqJ84YBg3WrHVqMTP
yxdG3hMW/wHBStekIaptjUXicZoJoRYpqyARPmQ3c0n8Or+9BimGwIBloI3sobKp
JjuTzha12y2Hbjl2MUXqIfmXLSiyL08gOdP55TfxQEAgjD9vBVRW3TUReJHMMQvI
70iTG6DUvKmOUEKy1YEqv5ODizR0gpwVhEALcRmHnkUTEXI6A825zeh7/x+M+n4f
cyXrM5tAVrPsv54a/Zvn18zxtWCOGQoHX4F/zLQdzAtXhS9qj1/XdHwc28Siz34=
=C+Nk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal




-- 
P2P Foundation: http://p2pfoundation.net  - http://blog.p2pfoundation.net

Connect: http://p2pfoundation.ning.com; Discuss:
http://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/p2p-foundation

Updates: http://del.icio.us/mbauwens; http://friendfeed.com/mbauwens;
http://twitter.com/mbauwens; http://www.facebook.com/mbauwens


[2 text/html]
______________________________
http://www.oekonux.org/journal



Thread: joxT00881 Message: 6/89 L5 [In date index] [In thread index]
Message 00889 [Homepage] [Navigation]