Message 00198 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT00100 Message: 36/51 L15 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Graham Seaman wrote:
On Sun, 16 Dec 2001 sjhs freeshell.org wrote:Paroli Esperanton estas certe solvo. Sed estas malfacila lerni cxiu persono kaj konservi sencon. _______________________My grandfather knew Esperanto; my wife's father too. Because of that I thought it was an idea from the past which had it's chance and didn't take off (and I had the impression it wasn't helpful for non-European language speakers). I just went to look at http://www.esperanto.net and found both those impressions were wrong....
Hm, the first and only time I looked closely at Esperanto I was repelled by it not having a gender-neutral pronoun, but reproducing male dominance as well as the male/female dichtonomy. To me, it seems an artificial language should *really* solve this problem if it wants to be considered worthwhile. I tried a web search on Esperanto and "gender neutral," but it didn't turn out too much. Can anybody tell me what's the current state of the discussion there? Have Esperanto-speaking people developed and adopted gender-neutral forms? Frankly, I'm not very interested in learning Esperanto if it just means struggling with patriarchial structures in yet another language. It may take longer, but still I'd rather pick up Finnish and learn a language that works without the gender marking garbage. Just my 0.02 ?. - Benja _______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT00100 Message: 36/51 L15 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 00198 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |