Message 00943 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT00811 Message: 14/33 L9 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox-en] Re: GFDL



Hi MJ!

2 hours ago MJ Ray wrote:
Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de> wrote:
So the worries of Thomas that someone may add invariant racist stuff
or things like that is not covered by the GFDL. The logic Benja sees
is regulated with substantiated rules and I see absolutely no problem
with this.

There's no problem with having to include their racist stuff verbatim if you
want to use their modifications to the main body of the text?  Did I
understand you correctly?

I'm not understanding your question completely. However, from the GFDL
it is perfectly clear that there must not be invariant racist stuff if
the document wants to comply to the GFDL. This applies to all content
text.

Everything which is marked as invariant must be a so-called secondary
section and this is any kind of meta text as far as I understood it.
Like the acknowledgments of friends and lovers, the authors, links to
the web copy, the ISBN number of a printed copy and so on.

So if I understand it correctly there is simply as little reason to
make a fuss about the invariant sections of the GFDL as of the
requirement to mention the original authors in the DSL.


						Mit Freien Grüßen

						Stefan

PS: Look at this zero below - a state I didn't reach for many months
    now. So if you're still waiting for an answer particularly from me
    - ask again ;-) .
__________________________
Unread: 41 [ox], 0 [ox-en]

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/



Thread: oxenT00811 Message: 14/33 L9 [In index]
Message 00943 [Homepage] [Navigation]