Message 01222 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT01142 Message: 18/21 L2 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Hi Rich and all! I had another thought on this. Last week (13 days ago) Rich Walker wrote:
Of course, this already happens - see the OHGPL for an example, and there is a lot of other stuff under opencores.org and other places in a similar vein. However, there may still be a difference between what can be done by a disparate diffident group of contributors, and what can be done by a highly-resourced focussed team. The issue we need to address is how to generate the equivalent of highly-resourced focussed teams without the current model of producing them.
Well, Free Software shows what disparate - while not diffident ;-) - groups of contributors can come to. However, you mentioned the point the high amount of resources needed to make some things happen. This is something where Free Software has the advantage that the means of production necessary for producing Free Software in many Western households are standard devices today. I think this is one of the main reasons why Free Software was able to take off at all. So the question comes back to the old socialist question of the means of production. However, in Free Software we see how the movement builds its own means of productions part by part. I mean the `gcc' - may be the root of everything - is one means of production. Emacs is another and so on. Continuing this thought would mean that the means of production necessary are built by the movement. I could imagine this may happen. Mit Freien Grüßen Stefan _______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT01142 Message: 18/21 L2 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 01222 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |