Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties

• From: Chris Croome <chris croome.net>
• Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:02:09 +0100

Hi

On Fri 05-Sep-2003 at 01:37:46PM [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED], auskadi wrote:

But back to the point: Anyone got any thoughts or
resources about this new form of "Open Source"?????

Mozilla is under the GPL as well as the MPL -- if I were
doing a binary version of it I'd just take the GPL and
build a GPL version of Mozilla. I don't understand why
RedHat and debian etc don't take this approach (perhaps
they do?). But perhaps I'm missing something :-)

Chris

--
http://chris.croome.net/

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
    • From: Benj. Mako Hill
  • Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
    • From: auskadi

• References:
  • [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
    • From: auskadi

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
• Previous in thread: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
• First in thread: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: Cross Posting
• Previous thread: [ox-en] /. article: Distribution of Wealth in a Robot-Driven World
• Next thread: [ox-en] Plans for a Linux Institute (Frederick Noronha)
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties
• Prev by Date: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties