Message 01265 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT01266 Message: 3/21 L2 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox-en] Open Source and Denied Parties

I was thinking that the answer if you have the skils is just to rebuild your own browser (but I cant do that) ... redhat would get caught by the same thing - seeking to conform with US law. I found some more stuff on an iranian list about it. I am going to think about this as it seems that the state is intervening in our free beer in way we should not accept 
M

Chris Croome wrote:


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi

On Fri 05-Sep-2003 at 01:37:46PM +0200, auskadi wrote:

But back to the point: Anyone got any thoughts or
resources about this new form of "Open Source"?????


Mozilla is under the GPL as well as the MPL -- if I were
doing a binary version of it I'd just take the GPL and
build a GPL version of Mozilla. I don't understand why
RedHat and debian etc don't take this approach (perhaps
they do?). But perhaps I'm missing something :-)

Chris
- -- http://chris.croome.net/ 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/WHtAIQYsxIuy3pERAsZaAKDTYAXbaRs7zuUQ+wRfhKnq4KHmQQCfR3da
IM7KuRs1fJAo1XQosMLObQQ=
=V75R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/




--
Martin Hardie
/\/\I-I/\/\I-I/\/\I-I/\/\I-I
auskadi tvcabo.co.mz
hardie ekno.com
/\/\I-I/\/\I-I/\/\I-I/\/\I-I
Avenida Julius Nyerere 812 7E
Maputo Mozambique (don't use the post!!) 
(258) 82 449428
/\/\I-I/\/\I-I/\/\I-I/\/\I-II
Artekale 30, 2A
Durango, 48200
Bizkaia, Euskal Herria,
(Spain) 

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT01266 Message: 3/21 L2 [In index]
Message 01265 [Homepage] [Navigation]