Message 01552 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT01530 Message: 8/9 L2 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Adam Moran wrote:
Hi, I've not got too hung up about re-naming the concept of "intellectual property" has this concept belongs to a decaying method of production. ( I am more interested in the language of our growing method of production, the language of our telos, so to speak ). I understand though that it is necessary to tackle the term "intellectual property" in order that we may tackle the concept of "intellectual property" in our own heads and the heads of others. May be we should unfold Proudhon's thoughts in to this thread. "If I were asked to answer the following question: What is slavery? and I should answer in one word, It is murder, my meaning would be understood at once. No extended argument would be required to show that the power to take from a man his thought, his will, his personality, is a power of life and death; and that to enslave a man is to kill him. Why, then, to this other question: What is property! may I not likewise answer, It is robbery, without the certainty of being misunderstood; the second proposition being no other than a transformation of the first?" Proudhon, Pierre Joseph . What is Property? An Inquiry into the Principle of Right and of Government.
Proudhon took part in the debate over intellectual property (involving Carey, Bastiat, Walras, Victor Hugo etc) after the Hague conference in 1858. By then apparently he'd changed his mind about property being theft and had a right-Hegelian view of property being the individuals defense against the state. But in the specific case of copyright his argument was that: 1. The author of a text is initially the owner of all rights in it. 2. The author may sell these rights; eg. to a publisher 3. As soon as anyone has published the text, ownership has been transferred to the public. If right, that's exactly the proposal of Boldrin and Levine now. There's an excellent description of the discussion (in French) at http://matisse.univ-paris1.fr/majorats/ my summary above came from that (only from memory). Graham
-- Adam _______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
_______________________ http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT01530 Message: 8/9 L2 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 01552 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |