Message 02144 [Homepage] [Navigation]
Thread: oxenT02135 Message: 2/7 L1 [In index]
[First in Thread] [Last in Thread] [Date Next] [Date Prev]
[Next in Thread] [Prev in Thread] [Next Thread] [Prev Thread]

Re: [ox-en] J Bywater - Deluze a holy fool?

Hi Johan,


Holy Fools http://www.hrc.wmin.ac.uk/theory-holyfools.html


Thanks for the reference. It lead me on to here:

http://rhizome.org/info/index.php
I've heard 'rhizome' mentioned on the list before, but had never understood the meaning. This to me seems a suitable word to use to describe the form of the phenomenon we are experiencing. 


Holy Fools http://www.hrc.wmin.ac.uk/theory-holyfools.html
Im trying to make my mind up on this, so im greatful for orientation.
I suppose it wouldn't take me long before quoting the metaphysics of Epicurus at Richard Barbrook ... at least in my head. I guess that would make me seem to him to be a holy fool. However I think he is mistaken to generalise the understandings of the people he tries to categories. For instance: 


At the end of the century, the superficiality of post-modernism is no longer fashionable among radical intellectuals. Because the Soviet Union has collapsed, the European avant-garde can return to its old obsession with Leninism.
I think this sentence tells us more about where Richard is, in his head, than anything else. 

--
Adam

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/
Thread: oxenT02135 Message: 2/7 L1 [In index]
Message 02144 [Homepage] [Navigation]