Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift

• From: berker airpost.net
• Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 11:43:12 +0100

On Tue, 21 Nov 2006 10:27:23 [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED]
"." <adam diamat.org.uk> wrote:

Mon, 06 Nov 2006 09:35:42 [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED] Gregers Petersen wrote:

Then I found and began reading through the oekonux site, and could
read that the basic premise "it is not a gift" was accepted -->
though without any extended argument (to me it more stood forward
as a provocation, which I definitely like and thing is correct).
On the other hand - it would be interesting to elaborate further on
the question: What is it then, if not a gift?

a strata of a pidgin mayhaps
an ontological facet

A delicate but powerful diffraction of monads.
t 

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• References:
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift
    • From: Gregers Petersen
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift
    • From: .

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift
• First in thread: [ox-en] Oekonux introduction
• Last in thread: [ox-en] Re: Keyword: Free Software Licences
• Previous thread: [ox-en] 2. WikiPosium in Wien - 2006
• Next thread: [ox-en] Study for German Ministry recommends Open Access
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] Re: Free Software is not a gift