Message 03876 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT03736 Message: 23/31 L12 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
I was reading that long email, and I have to say I agree with most of you say there, utill this point: On 9/4/07, Michael Bauwens <michelsub2003 yahoo.com> wrote:
a recent thoughtpiece: But I would like the readers to entertain the following proposition, nl. That: 1) The creation of non-monetary value is exponential 2) The monetization of such value is linear In other words, we have a growing discrepancy between the direct creation of use value through social relationships and collective intelligence (open platforms create near infinite value through the operations of the laws of Metcalfe and Reed), but only a fraction of that value can actually be captured by business and money. Innovation is becoming social and
It is so fashionable to quote Metcalfe or Reeds laws - but frankly it is also so shallow. Metcalfe law assumes that I see any value in belonging to all of the 2^n possible groups of n people - I don't. There might be some value in the possibility of a new group creation - but the more groups there are the value is smaller - because the groups overlap each other. There is another analysis: http://www.dtc.umn.edu/~odlyzko/doc/metcalfe.pdf that tries more honestly analyse what is the value of a communication network of size n and comes to the number around n log n. Cheers, Zbyszek http://brudnopis.blogspot.com/ _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT03736 Message: 23/31 L12 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 03876 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |