Re: [ox-en] Where / who is the enemy?
- From: Michael Bauwens <michelsub2003 yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2007 02:41:10 -0800 (PST)
Hi Franz,
you hit the nail on the head with your analogy, but that's exactly the important point, when the objective conditions for a certain type of domination is being eroded, they will seek to artificially maintain it, but that is a point of strength for the change-makers. It is important to 'sense' in which direction the underlying trends are going ... not to lull as asleep, but on the contrary to strengthen our resolve.
as for absolutism, I'm not sure that it was an attempt to maintain feudalism in its extreme. According to my readings, it was the balance of forces, declining feudals, emergent bourgeoisie, which created a stasis which allowed the kings to become all powerful as arbiters. It was perhaps an attempt to create a 'lid' on a very unstable equilibrium, so as to artificially maintain it for the longest possible time, until it eventually exploded in the favour of the rising structure.
Michel
The P2P Foundation researches, documents and promotes peer to peer alternatives.
Wiki and Encyclopedia, at http://p2pfoundation.net; Blog, at http://blog.p2pfoundation.net; Newsletter, at http://integralvisioning.org/index.php?topic=p2p
Basic essay at http://www.ctheory.net/articles.aspx?id=499; interview at http://poynder.blogspot.com/2006/09/p2p-very-core-of-world-to-come.html; video interview, at http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2006/09/29/network_collaboration_peer_to_peer.htm
----- Original Message ----
From: Franz Nahrada <f.nahrada reflex.at>
To: list-en oekonux.org
Cc: Stefan Merten <smerten oekonux.de>
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2007 2:11:27 PM
Subject: Re: [ox-en] Where / who is the enemy?
list-en oekonux.org writes:
The final issue which came up during the P2P workshop I want to
present here was: Who and where is the enemy?
If we think that peer production is subversive to capitalism then who
is protecting capitalism? Classicaly this was a task for the state.
However, nowadays at least in the EU the states are quite in favor of
Free Software and things like OpenAccess.
Michel thinks that hacking is not antagonistic to anything but a new
life practice and therefore there is no enemy. I tend to agree on the
"not-antagonistic" part but to me this doesn't explain why resistance
is low. Or do we still not yet saw the maximum resistance?
May be someone here has answers or interesting ideas?
----
very interesting question. It is astounding to me that you give that
diagnosis of the situation as it is, and that you do not mention or try
to
conceive the expansion of the Intellectual Property Regime in the last
decades.
according to the thesis of Group Krisis the regular "productive" way of
accumulatingcapital has lost its significance for the growth of
capital.
Its so ubiquitous that you cant generate high profit margins by simply
material "supply". The Quartz Part of a watch is as cheap as the
mineral
sand where Silicone might come from. (dont take me as an expert on
that)
Productivity gains destroy the value - generating capabilitries of
industries.
That is where the increasing importance of intellectual property comes
in.
Its more lucrative to forbid and allow activitities and to receive an
"information rent". There is a growing market for lucrative impediments
of
human activities. Thats unique and new in history.
So here is the enemy: capital that seeks to grow and chooses methods
that
impede human self-reliance. In order to maintain its growth it is ready
to
create constraints. Its an everyday phenomenon. "Customer satisfaction"
has turned to "customer binding", Its gardly difficult to see more and
more aggressive structural business practises taking place, and one of
these is to impede autonomy of work.
On the other side, the opposite trend exists too: the prosuming use of
user activity, even user innovation and user production. I think that
Eric
von Hippel has done groundbreaking research on this.
Its a situation like at the end of feudalism, where one side of the old
ruling class wants to go to the extreme of the old domination system
("absolutism") while on the other side the other faction wants to grab
new
opportunities.
In this context the question of the "enemy" can be posed and answered.
Also the question of the "allies".
Franz
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get easy, one-click access to your favorites.
Make Yahoo! your homepage.
http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de