Re: [ox-en] The Ideology of Free Culture and the Grammar of Sabotage
- From: Dmytri Kleiner <dk telekommunisten.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 17:37:01 +0100
On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 12:21:41 [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED], graham <graham theseamans.net> wrote:
Repetitive use of the ideas of 'parasite' and 'louse' is something very
characteristic of the rhetorical style of fascists
Not only is this controversy by extension, but also a guilt by association
fallacy.
Employing charges of "antisemitism" to dismiss arguments you disagree
with is characteristic of racist apologists for child murder, will
you now claim that Stafan Mn is "employing the structure of
pedocidal racism"
Please note that Matteo's article had nothing explicitly antisemetic
in it, anymore that Stafan's was explicitly racist and pedocidal.
You are simply hiding behind fallacies and reaching for whatever
justification you can to back up your locker-room buddy's vile
accusations.
Further, employing the metaphor of a parasite to describe the rentier
class is ubiquitous in all tendencies of leftist writing.
If one of your locker-room buddies had employed this metaphor,
the lesser Stefan would never have dreamed of calling them an
antisemite.
particularly so in Italy (I wouldn't know about Germany).
What do you do with lice? You crush them, because they are both
trivial and subhuman. It is a term
And what do with antisemites? When you can't arrest and censor them,
you can demonize them and reject their arguments out of hand.
How convenient for you.
This mood was fascist, in fact the whole technique is quite
typically fascist;
That you continue with more of these idiotic and unsubstantiated
characteristics proves beyond doubt you are a moron.
Now you have called Matteo a fascist? This is what you consider an
acceptable argument? You would be a laughing stock if such behaviour
wasn't so vile as to be disturbing.
[...]
That you are defending the clearly disgusting behavior of your
colleague the other Stefan is a form of gang violence and just
makes bad worse, you should be rebuking your colleague for
debasing this group with such garbage.
If you think that is gang violence you have a very strange idea of
violence.
You have already admitted that your intent was to be abusive, so your
pleading here is quite hollow.
And yes, when a group's insider's defend each other when making
reprehensible accusations towards an outsider, this is a kind of
gang violence, like when locker-room buddies inplicitly or explicitly
support each other's racist comments.
I thank Michel Bauwens for having the honesty and integrity to also
reject Stafan Mn's irresponsible accusations. It is unfortunate that
these traits appear quite rare here.
--
Dmytri Kleiner
editing text files since 1981
http://www.telekommunisten.net
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de