| Message 04459 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Thread: oxenT04118 Message: 26/27 L4 | [In index] | ||
| [First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
| [Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:29:26 [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED] Stefan Meretz wrote:
The prime simply says: M' > MAt one level of abstraction though, it´s just getting the maths wrong, or rather an inability, or reluctance to move past an approximate solution to a large set of simultaneous equations, the likes of which marx wrote upon in capital, viz: "20 yards of linen = 1 coat, or 20 Yards of linen are worth 1 coat." In part one of capital, marx shows how money becomes the approximate solution and then in part two, how the errors in the universal equivalent, come home to haunt us as money transforms in to capital. Wunt it just be lovely if we worked in a green field site and we could bang all these equations in to a great big matrix and flip the whole thing over with something like the simplex method rather than having the solution tied to something as ergonomically catastrophic as capital :)However, I don't understand what you want to calculate. On the level of values (not prices) there is nothing to calculate.
not sure i´ve gone off the boil with this thread the above i wrote mainly as a quick strife against capital i had some picture in my head of a method of exchange based on a style of mathematics other than that of mammon but in any case i don´t think i´m really on to anything here not even as a thought experiment _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
| Thread: oxenT04118 Message: 26/27 L4 | [In index] | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Message 04459 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |