Re: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"

• From: Stefan Meretz <stefan meretz.de>
• Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:34:58 +0200

On 2008-08-21 00:18, Paul Cockshott wrote:

Profit disappears when Competition is Perfect, but Competition is
usually not Perfect, so Profit is usually not Zero.

Profit and Competition are inversely related, while Profit and
Monopoly are directly related.  A Perfect Monopoly would enjoy
Infinite Profit, right?

OMG, Paul, this is simply wrong! What are saying here?

Ciao,
Stefan

-- 
Start here: www.meretz.de

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"
    • From: Patrick Anderson
  • RE: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"
    • From: Paul Cockshott
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"
    • From: graham

• References:
  • [ox-en] reprap, exploitation, free goods etc
    • From: graham
  • Re: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"
    • From: Patrick Anderson
  • RE: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"
    • From: Paul Cockshott

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"
• Previous in thread: RE: [ox-en] Re: "At Cost"
• First in thread: [ox-en] reprap, exploitation, free goods etc
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] reprap, exploitation, free goods etc
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Admin: Major major problem with server infrastructure
• Next thread: [ox-en] Freedom Hardware - or - Hardware Freedom
• Next by Date: RE: [ox-en] Robinsonades (was: Re: Role of markets)
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] Robinsonades (was: Re: Role of markets)