Message 05306 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT05287 Message: 13/15 L9 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] I think that we can't purify human nature with logic. The P2P Energy Economy model (on P2Pf wiki) goes to extreme lengths in some areas to make sure that the model's logic supersedes human irrationality (or the impure nature) but that resulted in one fatal contradiction: people should be able to give things completely for free without any expectation (i.e. true generosity) which the model had no way of allowing while also enforcing equitable exchange. So I've moved away from trying to purify human nature with logic and resorted to the much more limited goal of enabling voluntary reciprocal exchanges in immaterial resources that are already abundant (e.g. digital content) so as to have a participatory protocol that sustains the abundance of the given resource on scalable basis. That's a much lower intervention than trying to constrain human behavior... and I'm still thinking about it... On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:19 AM, Stefan Noack <noackstefan googlemail.com>wrote:
[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] Hi, On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 10:05 AM, marc fawzi <marc.fawzi gmail.com> wrote:[Converted from multipart/alternative] [1 text/plain] Giving and getting recommendations (or respect) in a reciprocal or generalized exchange is an ancient common social practice. I canrecommendyou if you recommend me back, or I can recommend you without expectingthatyou recommend me back. This is a common social practice and can happen asareciprocal exchange or as a generalized (non-reciprocal) exchange. Someone who is highly political can accumulate a lot of so-called"respect"without having any moral or intellectual merit. Try to solve that! i.e. how do you ensure that respect in society flows not based onpoliticalfavoritism but based on rational thought.My idea was to always have the respect coupled to the action it was given for; your example is a disadvantage of the respect systems that we have now, where the motivation for paying respect can become very irrational. Having the respect together with the reason it was paid for would allow me to evaluate my personal respect to that person based on my personal standards. However, i have no idea how this could be implemented practically. grüße stefan [2 text/html] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
[2 text/html] _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT05287 Message: 13/15 L9 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 05306 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |