Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion

• From: crox iac-research.ch (Christoph Reuss)
• Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 19:57:15 +0200

Diego Saravia wrote:

exchange.  Because "you can't have the cake and eat it too".  (Strange how
some opinions here resemble neo-con economic deceptions, as with interest
(usury)...)

interest was a medieval invention (I think, I dont remember), at least as a
force of economic growth. Was born at the same time as money, it existed
before but it was not an important institution.

I think you misunderstood.  I didn't suggest that interest was a neo-con
invention, but that some here believe in neo-con deceptions like:
(1) that you CAN have the cake and eat it too, and
(2) that interest (usury) is harmless.

Chris



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".


_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• First in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Previous thread: [ox-en] keimform.de: ox4 Notes III: Money and Patterns
• Next thread: Profit and Value, was: Re(2): [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion