Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion

• From: Diego Saravia <diego.saravia gmail.com>
• Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 15:09:20 -0300

[Converted from multipart/alternative]

[1 text/plain]
2009/5/5 Christoph Reuss <crox iac-research.ch>

Diego Saravia wrote:

exchange.  Because "you can't have the cake and eat it too".  (Strange

how

some opinions here resemble neo-con economic deceptions, as with

interest

(usury)...)

interest was a medieval invention (I think, I dont remember), at least as

a

force of economic growth. Was born at the same time as money, it existed
before but it was not an important institution.

(2) that interest (usury) is harmless.

for you is the same usury and  interest?



-- 
Diego Saravia
Diego.Saravia gmail.com
NO FUNCIONA->dsa unsa.edu.ar


[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• First in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Previous thread: [ox-en] keimform.de: ox4 Notes III: Money and Patterns
• Next thread: Profit and Value, was: Re(2): [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] extrinsic motivation = coercion