Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please

• From: "Franz Nahrada" <f.nahrada reflex.at>
• Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 14:16:37 +0200

Michel Bauwens writes:

Regarding the views of Genevieve, it doesn't seem to me that they
understand
the non-reciprocal nature of free software, and rather subsume everything
to
the gift economy. I have the feeling their views are very binary, gift
economy = female = good; exchange = male = bad ...

OK but what if we are able to show them the trap they are locking
themselves into?

I have the feeling they give a very interesting keynote to a different
perception of reality that does not necessarily lead to where they end so
far. And maybe for those who question value, money and market this is
still a valid discussion partner.

Franz

_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please
    • From: Michel Bauwens
  • Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please
    • From: Alex Rollin

• References:
  • Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please
    • From: Michel Bauwens

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please
• First in thread: [ox-en] Apple trees (aka capitalism) are bad. What about barter exchange?
• Last in thread: Re: Limiting use (was: Re: [ox-en] Apple trees (aka capitalism) are bad. What about barter exchange?)
• Previous thread: [ox-en] Marginalism - the religion
• Next thread: [ox-en] Administrative request: Cross-posting
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] Necessary growth (was: Re: Explanation of interest)
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] No more money trickery propaganda please