Re: [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)

• From: "Niall Douglas" <s_fsfeurope2 nedprod.com>
• Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2003 13:08:34 -0000

On 13 Dec 2003 at 12:00, Stefan Meretz wrote:

No, it is not the same. You can not fork the state. (Well, you can
leave, however, only into other states - not the state as "state". Or:
You can fork, but all current forks are as worse as they can be).

Surely isn't devolution of powers to regional parliaments a form of
forking? Well, perhaps a new CVS branch is more appropriate, but it's
got fork-like elements not in a branch.

Cheers,
Niall






_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)
    • From: pietro

• References:
  • SpamAssassin and OHA (was: [ox-en] SpamAssassin (was: OHA/ODA in English))
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)
    • From: Stefan Meretz

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)
• Previous in thread: [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)
• First in thread: Oekonux and politics (was:Re: [ox-en] Theses about the relation between the Oekonux project and the remaining world)
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: Oekonux and politics
• Previous thread: [ox-en] goal of oekonux, theory vs. practice, the new social movements and the left
• Next thread: Re: [ox] Oekonux and politics (was:Re: [ox-en] Theses about the relation between
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] Maussian ideas and Free Software
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] inside wsis