Re: [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)

• From: "pietro" <pietro bastardi.net>
• Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 16:43:28 -0200 (BRST)

Niall Douglas said:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 13 Dec 2003 at 12:00, Stefan Meretz wrote:

No, it is not the same. You can not fork the state. (Well, you can
leave, however, only into other states - not the state as "state". Or:
You can fork, but all current forks are as worse as they can be).

Surely isn't devolution of powers to regional parliaments a form of
forking? Well, perhaps a new CVS branch is more appropriate, but it's
got fork-like elements not in a branch.

isn't this fork as bad as the original "implementation"? you still have a
state, it's just smaller now.

pietro.

_______________________
http://www.oekonux.org/

• References:
  • SpamAssassin and OHA (was: [ox-en] SpamAssassin (was: OHA/ODA in English))
    • From: Stefan Merten
  • Re: [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)
    • From: Niall Douglas

• Next in thread: Re: [ox-en] Rules and alienation
• Previous in thread: Re: [ox-en] Rules and alienation (was: Re: SpamAssassin and OHA)
• First in thread: Oekonux and politics (was:Re: [ox-en] Theses about the relation between the Oekonux project and the remaining world)
• Last in thread: Re: [ox-en] Re: Oekonux and politics
• Previous thread: [ox-en] goal of oekonux, theory vs. practice, the new social movements and the left
• Next thread: Re: [ox] Oekonux and politics (was:Re: [ox-en] Theses about the relation between
• Next by Date: Re: [ox-en] inside wsis
• Prev by Date: Re: [ox-en] inside wsis