Message 02888 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] | |
---|---|---|---|
Thread: oxenT02752 Message: 70/123 L8 | [In index] | ||
[First in Thread] | [Last in Thread] | [Date Next] | [Date Prev] |
[Next in Thread] | [Prev in Thread] | [Next Thread] | [Prev Thread] |
in list-en oekonux.org Michel Bouwens on Mittwoch, 5. Oktober 2005 at 6:17 Uhr [PHONE NUMBER REMOVED] wrote:
Take any capital intensive industry. The model now is you need private capital for both the design phase and the production phase. If you separate the two, government or companies could write out specs, say for a new green car, and P2P teams would start working on it. When it is ready, capital would be use for production of the car. Better yet, if capital were itself distributed, corporations would not be needed even for that phase.
Michel, why should government or companies write out the specs? we have succesful examples where individuals or networks could do the job much better! From the beginning! I told at the third oekonux conference that even Markus Merz who is otherwise not really keeping up his community ("Open Source Car" Germany) gave examples of a "bootstrap community" being much more competent than any government agency or single company. The reason is that real people with different needs can aggregate perspectives, and different perspectives are needed for good design! I think the beauty of the New GPL economy should not be overseen: that intellect is so distributed that competent seed groups can contribute to the common good in an entirely new fashion. I agree governments could positively contribute by recognizing and supporting such "seeds of competence". The support of governments could be creating space for dialogue, infrastructure and conflict-moderation. am I dreaming here? Franz _________________________________ Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/ Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/ Contact: projekt oekonux.de
Thread: oxenT02752 Message: 70/123 L8 | [In index] | ||
---|---|---|---|
Message 02888 | [Homepage] | [Navigation] |