[Converted from multipart/alternative]
[1 text/plain]
Does this change the character of being peer-production?
Apart from the money/governance angle it is not clear to me how they
actually operate - how democratically or openly decisions are taken, apart
from the fact that the reason openleaks forked off was because "Schmitt"
contested the autocracry of the WL founder - see the Wired-leaked IRC chat
logs etc.
cheers,
Mathieu
----- Original Message -----
From: Stefan Meretz <stefan meretz.de>
Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011 10:49 pm
Subject: Re: [ox-en] WikiLeaks and peer production?
To: list-en oekonux.org
On 2011-02-08 21:56, Mathieu ONeil wrote:
(...) raised the question of the deal
with the newspapers: does it cover expenses, legal fees etc?
No-one
knows. So while they may be producing transparency externally the
same cannot be said for their inner operations.
Concerning WikiLeaks that's true and commonly criticized. We
will see if
OpenLeaks will do better. Is every free software project
transparent in
this regard (serious question, I don't know)?
Does this change the character of being peer-production?
Ciao,
Stefan
--
Start here: www.meretz.de
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de
****
Dr Mathieu O'Neil
Adjunct Research Fellow
Australian Demographic and Social Research Institute
College of Arts and Social Science
The Australian National University
email: mathieu.oneil[at]anu.edu.au
web: http://adsri.anu.edu.au/people/visitors/mathieu.php
[2 text/html]
_________________________________
Web-Site: http://www.oekonux.org/
Organization: http://www.oekonux.de/projekt/
Contact: projekt oekonux.de